“The world’s worst
director” became a tag for Uwe Boll, which caught in the masses. As can see in
documentary this contagious nickname pronounces people with bias and absence of
aspiration to study a person. My views to Boll’s works are variable, but I can
write a precisely about him – Uwe Boll has an individuality, what I don’t see
in modern makers of Hollywood movies. It mustn’t care who seated in chair for a
new part of ongoing franchise. By the way, I don’t see new talents in
independent cinema. Rare found happens only in documentary.
Sean Patrick Shaul did a
brilliant work in presence of famous director. He impressed in approaches to
Uwe Boll was combining to his story, interviews, materials of behind the scenes
and photos. I was glad that Shaul didn’t stay long in his childhood and could
to demonstrate needful, what gives enough about this director’s period. Boll is
diverse not only in films. A definition relates also to him as personality and people
had and have a straight contact confirms it.
Interviews with different
kind representors of cinema are additional to fascination to the film. Those men
and women were telling wonderful stories about Uwe Boll, but talks of many of
them makes unique the documentary in own approach to the director and not only
to him. This movie goes outside of Boll. To others excellent topics.
Shaul gracefully combined
telling with arguing about Uwe Boll and his activity, which might unite in a
question “Is he really so bad?” Every side gives reasoning answers, but through
them I saw and those people.
Was a dislike. It’s on
beeping of “nigger” when severe swears didn’t censure what is absurd for logic. Additionally
here, rises misunderstand to a title of film and a poster without stars in
first word. In decency question, I’m thinking, it mustn’t be selective where
and what to “beep”.
In all aspects it’s a great
documentary allows to see and understand who is Uwe Boll and as I wrote high,
outside of him.
No comments:
Post a Comment