The Godfather was
adaptation of unwritten book. It was the year 1967. Mario Puzo needed money
when Paramount’s vice president of production Peter Bart saw a potential in
writer’s manuscript in sixty pages. Two years later, the book was released and was
bestselling in sixty-seven weeks. Two more years later appeared film’s
adaptation. The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather: Part II (1974) are kind of
films where I remember names of characters. In 1977, director Francis Ford
Coppola edited movies in four-series The Godfather Saga for television, where
the story was set chronologically to where added unused scenes in theatrical
release. After appearance of The Godfather: Part III director again for home
screens did The Godfather Trilogy: 1901-1980 in 1992. The story also moves
chronologically, but Coppola didn’t use just few scenes from previous TV
release, which aren’t significant. Peculiarity (and I count it a deep disappointment.)
that television of that time didn’t allow cruelty and Francis Ford Coppola
edited and chose needful frames. I hope the director will fix it as did with
some other films. Version for television has as scenes, which must be in films
and as I didn’t like episode of beating and nearly killing of Don Fanucci by couple of petty bandits, because it kills
character’s authority and makes him pity. Vito Corleone before assassination of
Don Ciccio personally slays two retired Don’s made men. I like a conversation
with one of them about a boy and then revelation that he is that boy, which
finishes in death by paddle. Brilliant staged scene of revenge for Apollonia,
whose hiding murderer Fabrizio dies in same way as that tried to do with Michael. I
like a moment of short crawling after explosion.
NB. It was filmed
another version of character killing, which I don’t like. Michael personally
comes in pizzeria and shoots to it’s owner from lupara.
Francis Ford
Coppola talks in last years if he decide on quantity of films he would did only
the first part. Director sees the story completes here. Paramount wanted a
sequel and for motivation gave to Coppola a Mercedes-Benz limousine. The second
part he didn’t want to film and preferred to stay as producer when his chosen
Martin Scorsese will a director. Studio wanted Coppola. He agreed to did on
many own artistic conditions (first and second parts of The Godfather must
connect between each other; allowance of directing a production of San Francisco
Opera and based on own screenplay The Conversation; write a script for
adaptation of The Great Gatsby.). Also Francis Ford Coppola had a fine idea of
father and son in same age, which wanted to use somewhere. He saw that it can
do in The Godfather: Part II. Studio wasn’t liking “Part II” in title, because thought
that potential audience can accept as that’s a same film. Later using of numbers
became a practice.
Francis Ford
Coppola didn’t want to make a third part. Mario Puzo, who is writer of
spectacular two films, made a horrendous draft in 1978 on Antonio Corleone, who
was hired by CIA for killing Latin American dictator. He wrote a second time in
1986, which known about presence of Sonny Corleone’s illegitimate son Vincent
Mancini and young years of Sonny Corleone. Paramount had many screenplays and
were attaching many people for directing. One of them was Sylvester Stallone,
who failed audition on two deadly roles of Carlo Rizzi and Paulie Gatto in The
Godfather. From his words, “The Godfather III situation unfolded when the head
of Paramount presented me poster with a poster already printed that had my
picture and beneath it “The Godfather III, written, acted and directed by
Sylvester Stallone.” Needless to say, if I weren’t wearing a hat, my skull
would’ve split in two. Red-faced, I said to the headman “This is the worst idea
since my conception.” Francis created duel masterpieces and it was egregious
insensitivity to pull it away from his for monetary reasons. Therefore I took
this idea to the sea of mediocrity and plunged it to the bottom.” I am same
opinion. Francis Ford Coppola filmed it, because needed in money for pay debt
created by failure of One from the Heart (1981), which was settled in 90s.
Another condition for Paramount was major financing of director’s Tucker: The
Man and His Dream.
I never saw The
Godfather: Part III in full. Every time of broadcasting on TV was short in any
shown scene. I like tones, which follows to previous parts and nothing more in
this awful film. Head of mafia presented as confirmed patriarch whom nobody
respects. He is pity in attempt on importance of law degree for his son. What
is a trouble to find an attorney? Presence of Key has a reason for commercial
purposes as a character of previous parts. Of course, The Godfather 1-2 has
mistake on accuracy of mafia, but I couldn’t look when underboss executes hitman’s
job. Frequent annoying hysteria of Andy Garcia’s character in necessity to kill
Joey Zaza or a sloppy staged scene with two assassins. Dialogs can pronounce people
who made farewell to commonsense. What I saw in screenplay isn’t elaborated. Killing
by glasses makes
me laugh, because it recalls parody Mafia! by Jim Abrahams where one hitman
takes a cover of Riverdance dancer. On surviving of shooting from helicopters, Michael
says that Joey Zaza can’t allow helicopter and it must be somebody mighty.
Really?
The Godfather
IV, which was titled The Godfather: The Final Part, was in development in which
Coppola and Puzo agreed, because the last wanted to make money for his kids.
Narration of
potential film projected to repeat a structure of the second part what is not
good as was reusing simultaneous kills in the third part. One action happens in
30s, where Robert De Niro resumes role of Vito Corleone and Leonardo DiCaprio
planned to perform young Sonny Corleone. A second timeframe takes place in 80s
and then 90s where was known that Andy Garcia and Talia Shire were ready to
play their characters. For plot of this potential film’s part should have been fresh
actual events what shows here that fantasy was nullified. Prickly boss Vincent
Mancini makes from Corleone family in drugdealing clan what moves to
degradation and eventually it finishes in storming of police special forces
where from one of them Mancini gets a shot as whole was with Pablo Escobar,
whose story was a pattern for the fourth film. Coppola wanted to finish the
film in far-fetched dramatizing of simultaneous deaths of Mancini and
Michael Corleone. It could be worst of The Godfather III. Death of Mario Puzo
influenced on director to stop production, because he respects original
creator.
The fourth film
wasn’t released, but setting of 30s years in Puzo’s screenplay was transferred
in the book The Family Corleone written by unknown Ed Falco.
Nothing exquisite
in a text, which reading stopped close to half of the book. It was with feeling of
throwing first from mind. Characters, who would be die shortly, live longer for
make this composition in almost four hundred fifty pages. The Family Corleone’s
actions aren’t from world, which I know. Dialogs contain simplistic phrases for
filling empty spaces. Once was a moment where one personage went poetic about
two wounded associates. One got a bullet in leg and it would to make him “eunuch”
if moved on three inches in left. Second was shot in wrist and it was compared
with “crucifixion of Jesus”. Not once Falco’s describing of situation was
making me awkward. His using of Italian words don’t fit. I’ve dropped this hopeless
book and cooked a rest of pasta, which stirred with fried onion and pieces of
meat on pan to where added ketchup and drop of adjika and stirred again.
No comments:
Post a Comment